From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | liuyuanyuan <liuyuanyuangogo(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Re: 答复: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Fix SQL for GRANT on a sequence |
Date: | 2014-07-20 20:38:25 |
Message-ID: | CAECtzeVEtyqaJLy=F9HxVfj2-AxKU8vzUynxFMC2ahTSdbtw4A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
2014-07-15 9:21 GMT+02:00 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:45 AM, liuyuanyuan <liuyuanyuangogo(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your attention to this topic!
>>
>> In fact, none pgadmin can be compatible with all versions of the
>> database.
>>
>
> We've done pretty well so far, supporting right back to 7.3, through we
> don't officially support the much older versions now, but that's mostly due
> to the amount of testing it requires.
>
>
>> Although earlier versions of PG don't support GRANT ON SEQUENCE,
>>
>> but new versions support. So I think this adjustment is necessary .
>>
>
> Old versions supported GRANT ON TABLE for sequences iirc, (as sequences
> are members of pg_class). This change is only necessary if newer versions
> of PostgreSQL dropped that syntax. It may be desirable, if we no longer
> support any versions of PostgreSQL that needed the old syntax.
>
>
It's still better to use the new syntax when it's available (ie, since 8.3).
>
--
Guillaume.
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2014-07-20 20:39:57 | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Fix SQL for GRANT on a sequence |
Previous Message | Ashesh Vashi | 2014-07-19 21:12:04 | Re: PATCH: new feature for Query tool: Favourites injection |