| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Upgrade master/slave: rsync? |
| Date: | 2017-09-13 16:13:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAECtzeUjBCb-TZ90E+SG+iohjzTdfQ0wdNfM8sKL1uSm1dWKVA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
2017-09-12 23:57 GMT+02:00 Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us>:
> Planning steps to upgrade our 9.2 DB to the latest stable 9.6 using
> pg_upgrade. I've gone through the steps for a primary/standalone DB and
> they work well. Looking into how then to upgrade the standby, the
> documentation says that *the data_dir from the master should be rsync'ed
> to each slave*.
>
> Is this truly the case?
>
It is.
Having to copy all the data from the primary will be a huge issue for our
> larger databases. I had hoped we'd just need to upgrade the binaries, copy
> the old data dir to the new data dir, update conf files as needed and turn
> it back on (similar to Oracle standby upgrade).
>
>
--
Guillaume.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-09-13 16:24:13 | Re: Upgrade master/slave: rsync? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-13 14:00:54 | Re: Configure Python 3 |