thanks!
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 11:27 AM, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Friday, December 15, 2017, john snow <ofbizfanster(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>> anything we can do or configure so that failed inserts wont advance the
>> nextval for the primary key?
>>
>
> No. PostgreSQL favors concurrency in this. If you want to go gap-less you
> will need to write it up yourself.
>
> David J.
>