| From: | Susan Cassidy <susan(dot)cassidy(at)decisionsciencescorp(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rodrigo Gonzalez <rjgonzale(dot)lists(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: puzzling perl DBI vs psql problem |
| Date: | 2014-03-13 20:44:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAE3Q8omQtUq0jy-AR89hrQ0fWC9R+6v+R1gVsTt+qNLAh+urOg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
No, I don't have 2 instances running. I default the port on the psql
command line, and the perl program is using 5432, as normal.
Now, I'm discovering that syslog is no longer logging anything. I bounced
it, but to no avail.
Susan
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Rodrigo Gonzalez <rjgonzale(dot)lists(at)gmail(dot)com
> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:28:38 -0700
> Susan Cassidy <susan(dot)cassidy(at)decisionsciencescorp(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > No, it is connecting to localhost, which is the same system I am
> > running psql on.
> >
> > Susan
> >
> Well, if one query is logged and the other one is not it means that it
> is running against different servers (as far as I understand
> logging)....
>
> Maybe psql is connecting using one socket and perl using another one?
> maybe you have 2 instances running?
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | MOLINA BRAVO FELIPE DE JESUS | 2014-03-13 20:53:22 | Re: puzzling perl DBI vs psql problem |
| Previous Message | Rodrigo Gonzalez | 2014-03-13 20:34:28 | Re: puzzling perl DBI vs psql problem |