Re: [v9.2] DROP Reworks Part.1 - Consolidate routines to handle DropStmt

From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [v9.2] DROP Reworks Part.1 - Consolidate routines to handle DropStmt
Date: 2011-07-09 07:01:19
Message-ID: CADyhKSXNhcfSiQXM+4TCECQW7P+L+OsQ4f_Jt7pF-_UA-kCFPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/7/9 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I definitely agree with this idea. It will enables to eliminate ugly switch
>> statements for error-messaging reasons.
>
> All right, so please submit a patch that introduces that concept
> first, and then resubmit this patch rebased over those changes.
>
> In view of the time remaining in this CommitFest, I am going to mark
> this Returned with Feedback for now.  The next CommitFest starts
> September 15th, but I'll try to review it sooner as time permits.
>
OK, Thanks for your reviewing.

--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2011-07-09 07:03:17 Re: [HACKERS] Creating temp tables inside read only transactions
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2011-07-09 07:00:30 Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 1