From: | Kurt Buff <kurt(dot)buff(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Benjamin Smith <lists(at)benjamindsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Recommendations for SSDs in production? |
Date: | 2011-11-04 03:21:25 |
Message-ID: | CADy1Ce4Mz7ZOCzdnfyHD9GPtyqRjnP2VSkTGVPUgPt2C4peZVw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 16:15, Benjamin Smith <lists(at)benjamindsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:59:37 AM you wrote:
>> There's a pretty varied mix of speed, durability, and price with any
>> SSD based architecture, but the two that have proven best in our
>> testing and production use (for ourselves and our clients) seem to be
>> Intel (mostly 320 series iirc), and Fusion-IO. I'd start with looking
>> at those.
>
> This is *exactly* the type of feedback that I've been looking for - thanks!
>
> The Fusion IO looks to be in the "if you have to ask about prices you probably
> can't afford it" range, although getting a million IOPS is damned impressive.
> I'm surprised a bit by the Intel 320 referenced, since this is typically
> touted as a consumer device, but we've consequently decided to give the 710 a
> shot since it's basically a 320 with some reliability upgrades, and see how it
> goes.
>
> I will post my results here later, time permitting.
Oddly enough, Tom's Hardware has a review of the Intel offering today
- might be worth your while to take a look at it.
Kurt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Efrain Lopez | 2011-11-04 04:37:35 | Hint for a query |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-11-04 01:55:58 | Re: equivalent to "replication_timeout" on standby server |