From: | Benjamin Smith <lists(at)benjamindsmith(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Recommendations for SSDs in production? |
Date: | 2011-11-03 23:15:53 |
Message-ID: | 201111031615.53227.lists@benjamindsmith.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:59:37 AM you wrote:
> There's a pretty varied mix of speed, durability, and price with any
> SSD based architecture, but the two that have proven best in our
> testing and production use (for ourselves and our clients) seem to be
> Intel (mostly 320 series iirc), and Fusion-IO. I'd start with looking
> at those.
This is *exactly* the type of feedback that I've been looking for - thanks!
The Fusion IO looks to be in the "if you have to ask about prices you probably
can't afford it" range, although getting a million IOPS is damned impressive.
I'm surprised a bit by the Intel 320 referenced, since this is typically
touted as a consumer device, but we've consequently decided to give the 710 a
shot since it's basically a 320 with some reliability upgrades, and see how it
goes.
I will post my results here later, time permitting.
Thanks again.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-11-04 01:55:58 | Re: equivalent to "replication_timeout" on standby server |
Previous Message | David Kerr | 2011-11-03 22:30:20 | Foreign Keys and Deadlocks |