Re: WAL log archival on standby

From: Sameer Kumar <sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL log archival on standby
Date: 2015-06-20 12:14:41
Message-ID: CADp-Sm6iBDdHhKcT2=8qmNZxduKJLzvWnEY5QtQjF0AxZ5ziyA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 13:46 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:38 PM, James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com>
wrote:

Hey All,

Is it possible to create WAL archive files on standby servers when using
streaming replication?

Yes and no, standbys do not archive WAL in ~9.4, but you could use
archive_mode = 'always' with the upcoming 9.5.

I know I can use archive_command or pg_receivexlog - but these will both
result in me sending information to the standby servers which has already
been sent via standard streaming replication. This would result in a
doubling of my network traffic.

Ideally I'd prefer to conserve this bandwidth and write the files to a
local archive on any active standby.

Both methods you mentioned are the way to go for now I am afraid, or you
wait for 9.5.

I have not tried it yet but should be possible to use pg_receivexlog from
the standby. If I can use standby server to create a streaming replica and
with pg_basebackup it should be possible to stream wal for archiving too.

Regards
Sameer

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2015-06-20 14:23:41 Trying to avoid a simple temporary variable declaration in a pl/pgsql function
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2015-06-19 20:35:17 Re: Postgresql 9.2 has standby server lost data?