From: | Sameer Kumar <sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WAL log archival on standby |
Date: | 2015-06-20 12:14:41 |
Message-ID: | CADp-Sm6iBDdHhKcT2=8qmNZxduKJLzvWnEY5QtQjF0AxZ5ziyA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 13:46 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:38 PM, James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com>
wrote:
Hey All,
Is it possible to create WAL archive files on standby servers when using
streaming replication?
Yes and no, standbys do not archive WAL in ~9.4, but you could use
archive_mode = 'always' with the upcoming 9.5.
I know I can use archive_command or pg_receivexlog - but these will both
result in me sending information to the standby servers which has already
been sent via standard streaming replication. This would result in a
doubling of my network traffic.
Ideally I'd prefer to conserve this bandwidth and write the files to a
local archive on any active standby.
Both methods you mentioned are the way to go for now I am afraid, or you
wait for 9.5.
I have not tried it yet but should be possible to use pg_receivexlog from
the standby. If I can use standby server to create a streaming replica and
with pg_basebackup it should be possible to stream wal for archiving too.
Regards
Sameer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2015-06-20 14:23:41 | Trying to avoid a simple temporary variable declaration in a pl/pgsql function |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2015-06-19 20:35:17 | Re: Postgresql 9.2 has standby server lost data? |