From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WAL log archival on standby |
Date: | 2015-06-19 05:45:27 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTyEh0B83fwqFGw2sK1HrLTJTuNODXE_mTcqgVP5y6oBw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:38 PM, James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> Is it possible to create WAL archive files on standby servers when using
> streaming replication?
>
Yes and no, standbys do not archive WAL in ~9.4, but you could use
archive_mode = 'always' with the upcoming 9.5.
I know I can use archive_command or pg_receivexlog - but these will both
> result in me sending information to the standby servers which has already
> been sent via standard streaming replication. This would result in a
> doubling of my network traffic.
>
Ideally I'd prefer to conserve this bandwidth and write the files to a
> local archive on any active standby.
>
Both methods you mentioned are the way to go for now I am afraid, or you
wait for 9.5.
Regards,
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2015-06-19 08:19:04 | Re: valgrind |
Previous Message | James Sewell | 2015-06-19 05:38:14 | WAL log archival on standby |