Re: repmgr: Do we need separate versions of repmgr for separate PG versions?

If repmgr is not PG version dependant, it should all go into the same
directory, on the other hand if it is version dependant, I would add the
version of postgres to the package name.

Strahinja Kustudić | Lead System Engineer | Nordeus

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:47 +0200, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
>
> > I am working on improving repmgr packaging. Do we need separate repmgr
> > versions for separate PG versions? Right now, we don't have separate
> > package for 9.3, and 9.4 for example. Is that an issue?
>
> Tired me -- I meant to say:
>
> * Right now, we don't have PostgreSQL version number in the package, but
> we install them under PostgreSQL directory /usr/pgsql-9.X/... . Either
> we will install the binaries and libs under /usr/bin and /usr/sbin
> and /usr/lib(64), or leave the files as where they are now and add PG
> version number to the package name.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Devrim GÜNDÜZ
> Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
> Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
>
>