Re: repmgr: Do we need separate versions of repmgr for separate PG versions?

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: repmgr: Do we need separate versions of repmgr for separate PG versions?
Date: 2015-02-24 14:54:17
Message-ID: 1424789657.17420.52.camel@gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum


Hi,

On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:47 +0200, Devrim Gündüz wrote:

> I am working on improving repmgr packaging. Do we need separate repmgr
> versions for separate PG versions? Right now, we don't have separate
> package for 9.3, and 9.4 for example. Is that an issue?

Tired me -- I meant to say:

* Right now, we don't have PostgreSQL version number in the package, but
we install them under PostgreSQL directory /usr/pgsql-9.X/... . Either
we will install the binaries and libs under /usr/bin and /usr/sbin
and /usr/lib(64), or leave the files as where they are now and add PG
version number to the package name.

Regards,

--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Strahinja Kustudić 2015-02-24 16:24:16 Re: repmgr: Do we need separate versions of repmgr for separate PG versions?
Previous Message Devrim Gündüz 2015-02-24 14:47:53 repmgr: Do we need separate versions of repmgr for separate PG versions?