| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dang Minh Huong <kakalot49(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JDBC-94: "Multiple resultsets were returned by query" in query end with "; " |
| Date: | 2015-10-07 12:34:19 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHL10T1F1v3wyqeVWMes5i=PNuyF_4bMX20Z5c8DgTyORg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
This is a very good question, but lots of people cut and paste SQL into
code ... sometimes the ; gets in there.
Behaviour of previous version is important, but in this case It may not be
justified.
Anyone else have an opinion ?
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On 7 October 2015 at 08:30, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> I wonder why pgjdbc would want to silently ignore that user error?
> Is "behavior of previous version" a sole justification?
>
> I've drafted https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/386 to cover that.
>
> Vladimir
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher BROWN | 2015-10-07 12:42:33 | Re: JDBC-94: "Multiple resultsets were returned by query" in query end with "; " |
| Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2015-10-07 12:30:57 | Re: JDBC-94: "Multiple resultsets were returned by query" in query end with "; " |