Re: Possible bug / regression from generated keys

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: dmp <danap(at)ttc-cmc(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Cooner <petriborg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Possible bug / regression from generated keys
Date: 2012-11-08 13:02:54
Message-ID: CADK3HHKPv=8M0TuV6EoDgxpaAhgRjEgt93a9iwN4_VsEVoEw2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

So I had a quick look at the code and the only way it gets into this code
is through a test which is essentially

if ( isBinary and isINT8 )

So unless the backend is sending an int8 as less than 8 bytes or there is
some other bug in the JDBC code in which it gets confused as to what it is
pointing to I don't see how it gets to this exception.

Dave

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:04 PM, dmp <danap(at)ttc-cmc(dot)net> wrote:

> I can try as indicated to rebuild the jar so that Peter could have an
> output
> of the exact value that is throwing the error when it occurs. To limit
> output
> I would then recommend a case that would throw the error soon with as
> little data processing as possible. Let me know if this maybe something I
> could do
> to help.
>
> danap.
>
>
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> Well there is a relatively easy fix that would get rid of the problem.
>> Currently we don't check the length of the array that we are trying to
>> convert. However I'd like to understand how the problem is manifest
>> before doing that.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> Dave Cramer
>>
>> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
>> http://www.credativ.ca
>>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Cooner 2012-11-08 13:08:13 Re: Possible bug / regression from generated keys
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2012-11-08 08:12:59 Re: Error while returning auto-generated values