Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables
Date: 2017-05-18 17:02:04
Message-ID: CADK3HHJSaq1+E-fK-qg40dUWkazqtaMbMSYQVp=gDS9a1ty_oA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

I've reordered them in my PR

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com

On 18 May 2017 at 10:56, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Thomas>On 17 May 2017 at 15:42, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
> wrote:
> Thomas>I have updated the patch
>
> Thanks for the patch, however it looks a bit odd when order of 'r','p'
> differs from line to line.
> Can you please use some consistent order for r and p?
>
> Vladimir
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert 'Bobby' Zenz 2017-05-19 15:12:53 [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] 5b9edb: fix: Add fallback to setObject(int, Object) for Nu...
Previous Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2017-05-18 14:56:45 Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables