Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables
Date: 2017-05-18 14:56:45
Message-ID: CAB=Je-EDO2ngb0WBjYEux6WyUFrh_f6oo0kZbHH27+VVmN7zeg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Thomas>On 17 May 2017 at 15:42, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
Thomas>I have updated the patch

Thanks for the patch, however it looks a bit odd when order of 'r','p'
differs from line to line.
Can you please use some consistent order for r and p?

Vladimir

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2017-05-18 17:02:04 Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2017-05-18 13:38:00 Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables