| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Wooten <kdubb(at)me(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Hernández <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Backend protocol wanted features |
| Date: | 2015-12-29 21:49:46 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HH+_F0bB1XzAjTmCJa-tX6W8iC=rdnv-Je=CjaZ9Kt5SEA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
I did float this balloon and the response was "there will be a fairly high
bar to adoption". Not that that should stop this effort. Just sayin'
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
On 29 December 2015 at 16:47, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com
> wrote:
> >Well we would be adding messages that current protocol handlers may not
> know how to deal with which will likely require them to rewrite their code
>
> Not sure if backend developers would be happy to support multiple
> protocols at the same time.
> opt-in approach with "facelifted messages" seems more plausible.
> Vladimir
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Wooten | 2015-12-29 21:49:48 | Re: Backend protocol wanted features |
| Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2015-12-29 21:47:13 | Re: Backend protocol wanted features |