Re: Backend protocol wanted features

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Wooten <kdubb(at)me(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Hernández <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Backend protocol wanted features
Date: 2015-12-29 21:47:13
Message-ID: CAB=Je-HS+moyNRDHvsAj_ePem8WV_87cCk+-=zagEdZZ6FAiVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

>Well we would be adding messages that current protocol handlers may not know how to deal with which will likely require them to rewrite their code

Not sure if backend developers would be happy to support multiple
protocols at the same time.
opt-in approach with "facelifted messages" seems more plausible.
Vladimir

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2015-12-29 21:49:46 Re: Backend protocol wanted features
Previous Message Kevin Wooten 2015-12-29 21:33:37 Re: Backend protocol wanted features