From: | Amadeo Gallardo <amadeo(at)ruddr(dot)io> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 16.1 - Bug: cache entry already complete |
Date: | 2024-01-02 19:51:07 |
Message-ID: | CADFREbWeAhTHwCOunhXJiBEsjyZfmhCdX2=VswQ5XVwNm8JYqQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Tom,
Thanks for reaching out. So far, I was able to narrow it down to a problem
when doing a union between two tables, one of them having a varchar column
and the other one having a text column. Adding an explicit cast seems to
have fixed it, but not really sure why yet. I will try to create a simple
repro scenario.
Thanks,
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:31 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amadeo Gallardo <amadeo(at)ruddr(dot)io> writes:
> > Upgrading from Postgres 14 to Postgres 16.1 introduced the following
> error
> > when running a query:
>
> > nativeError: error: select "date", coalesce(sum(hours), 0) as "hours"
> from
> > "allocation_date" where "allocation_date"."project_id" = $1 and
> > "allocation_date"."date" > $2 and "allocation_date"."hours" > $3 group by
> > "date" order by "date" asc - cache entry already complete
>
> > Note that `allocation_date` is a fairly complex view. Not quite sure what
> > causes the "cache entry already complete", but it consistently failed in
> > both the MacOS and Windows installations.
>
> The only occurrence of that error string is in nodeMemoize.c, so
> I suppose you've found a bug in Memoize. A bit odd that it doesn't
> manifest in v14 where Memoize came in. But anyway, can you reduce
> this to a self-contained test case?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
*Amadeo Gallardo*
email: amadeo(at)ruddr(dot)io
mobile: 786.961.0106
web: www.ruddr.io
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-01-02 20:28:40 | Re: lost status 'STATUS_EOF' for authentication when using 'MD5' or 'scram-sha-256' |
Previous Message | aa | 2024-01-02 17:56:42 | Re: Out of the box, full text search feature suggestion for postgresql |