From: | Amadeo Gallardo <amadeo(at)ruddr(dot)io> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 16.1 - Bug: cache entry already complete |
Date: | 2024-01-02 23:48:58 |
Message-ID: | CADFREbVAApY+zq7ep=4VeLwb30QAk5mrAd0xnNeqq63Ec8m1hA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
Attached is a sample script that I used to reproduce the error. I had to
add some specific sample data and force-disable certain planner settings,
as otherwise the problem did not occur.
Additionally, here's a trace of the error:
org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: cache entry already complete
> at
> org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.receiveErrorResponse(QueryExecutorImpl.java:2676)
> at
> org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.processResults(QueryExecutorImpl.java:2366)
> at
> org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.execute(QueryExecutorImpl.java:356)
> at org.postgresql.jdbc.PgStatement.executeInternal(PgStatement.java:496)
> at org.postgresql.jdbc.PgStatement.execute(PgStatement.java:413)
> at org.postgresql.jdbc.PgStatement.executeWithFlags(PgStatement.java:333)
> at org.postgresql.jdbc.PgStatement.executeCachedSql(PgStatement.java:319)
> at org.postgresql.jdbc.PgStatement.executeWithFlags(PgStatement.java:295)
> at org.postgresql.jdbc.PgStatement.execute(PgStatement.java:290)
Hopefully this helps to narrow down the issue.
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 4:51 PM Amadeo Gallardo <amadeo(at)ruddr(dot)io> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for reaching out. So far, I was able to narrow it down to a problem
> when doing a union between two tables, one of them having a varchar column
> and the other one having a text column. Adding an explicit cast seems to
> have fixed it, but not really sure why yet. I will try to create a simple
> repro scenario.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:31 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Amadeo Gallardo <amadeo(at)ruddr(dot)io> writes:
>> > Upgrading from Postgres 14 to Postgres 16.1 introduced the following
>> error
>> > when running a query:
>>
>> > nativeError: error: select "date", coalesce(sum(hours), 0) as "hours"
>> from
>> > "allocation_date" where "allocation_date"."project_id" = $1 and
>> > "allocation_date"."date" > $2 and "allocation_date"."hours" > $3 group
>> by
>> > "date" order by "date" asc - cache entry already complete
>>
>> > Note that `allocation_date` is a fairly complex view. Not quite sure
>> what
>> > causes the "cache entry already complete", but it consistently failed in
>> > both the MacOS and Windows installations.
>>
>> The only occurrence of that error string is in nodeMemoize.c, so
>> I suppose you've found a bug in Memoize. A bit odd that it doesn't
>> manifest in v14 where Memoize came in. But anyway, can you reduce
>> this to a self-contained test case?
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>
>
> --
> *Amadeo Gallardo*
> email: amadeo(at)ruddr(dot)io
> mobile: 786.961.0106
> web: www.ruddr.io
>
--
*Amadeo Gallardo*
email: amadeo(at)ruddr(dot)io
mobile: 786.961.0106
web: www.ruddr.io
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
cache-entry-already-complete.zip | application/x-zip-compressed | 3.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-01-02 23:59:08 | Re: Postgres 16.1 - Bug: cache entry already complete |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-01-02 20:28:40 | Re: lost status 'STATUS_EOF' for authentication when using 'MD5' or 'scram-sha-256' |