Re: jsonlog missing from logging_collector description

From: Umar Hayat <postgresql(dot)wizard(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonlog missing from logging_collector description
Date: 2025-01-31 12:48:25
Message-ID: CAD68Dp1gL9g_EJkFq2LV7RjK+Cz_CDNqWtjUaCx5AzVd0pA8qg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 at 20:41, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 2:43 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 06:09:48PM +0900, Umar Hayat wrote:
> > > Enabling logging_collector is required for json log. During jsonlog
> > > implementation [1], log destination and logging_collector comments in
> > > postgresql.conf.sample and documentation was updated but
> > > logging_collector short description was not updated in guc.c (which is
> > > guc_table.c now).
> > > Attached is the patch for this minor fix.
> > >
> > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAH7T-aqswBM6JWe4pDehi1uOiufqe06DJWaU5=X7dDLyqUExHg@mail.gmail.com
> >
> > Thanks for the report. This one is on me, will fix.
> > --
> > Michael
>
> - gettext_noop("Start a subprocess to capture stderr output and/or
> csvlogs into log files."),
> + gettext_noop("Start a subprocess to capture stderr, csvlog and/or
> jsonlog into log files."),
>
> Did you remove the word "output" intentionally? It is related to
> stderr and not jsonlog. I think, stderr usually refers to a file or a
> file descriptor hence we added word "output" there. I wouldn't touch
> it.

Yes, It was omitted intentionally to match the wording in
postgresql.conf.sample and documentation of logging_collector.

>
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat

--
Umar Hayat
Bitnine (https://bitnine.net/)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-01-31 12:59:11 Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2025-01-31 12:32:29 Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?