Re: meson "experimental"?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: meson "experimental"?
Date: 2024-05-30 15:03:33
Message-ID: CAD5tBc+RvReoXWZWLg__-StCcBEc_z=bONeG=AYZXShTjAcbnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:32 AM Aleksander Alekseev <
aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> By a quick look on the buildfarm we seem to use Ninja >= 1.11.1.
> However since Meson can use both Ninja and VS as a backend I'm not
> certain which section would be most appropriate for naming the minimal
> required version of Ninja.
>
>
When I tried building with the VS backend it blew up, I don't recall the
details. I think we should just use ninja everywhere. That keeps things
simple. On Windows I just install python and then do "pip install meson
ninja"

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey M. Borodin 2024-05-30 17:25:29 Re: Add LSN <-> time conversion functionality
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2024-05-30 15:00:00 The xversion-upgrade test fails to stop server