| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: meson "experimental"? |
| Date: | 2024-05-31 15:55:29 |
| Message-ID: | 1F86A227-9FDF-41CA-96AD-96E7C18E51C8@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On May 30, 2024 8:03:33 AM PDT, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:32 AM Aleksander Alekseev <
>aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> By a quick look on the buildfarm we seem to use Ninja >= 1.11.1.
>> However since Meson can use both Ninja and VS as a backend I'm not
>> certain which section would be most appropriate for naming the minimal
>> required version of Ninja.
>>
>>
>When I tried building with the VS backend it blew up, I don't recall the
>details. I think we should just use ninja everywhere. That keeps things
>simple.
VS should work, and if not, we should fix it. It's slow, so I'd not use it for scheduled builds, but for people developing using visual studio.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2024-05-31 17:01:48 | meson and check-tests |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-05-31 14:33:56 | Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 |