From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Improve description of XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS |
Date: | 2022-07-21 07:58:45 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoDpy2nVJ6wq=qUnZqPoMhcRjYWQ=nyCNNTV+1MVzq=KWg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 4:29 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> At Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:21:09 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote in
> >
> >
> > On 2022/07/21 10:13, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I realized that standby_desc_running_xacts() in standbydesc.c doesn't
> > > describe subtransaction XIDs. I've attached the patch to improve the
> > > description.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > The patch looks good to me.
>
> The subxids can reach TOTAL_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS =
> PGPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS(=64) * PROCARRAY_MAXPROCS. xact_desc_commit
> also shows subtransactions but they are at maximum 64. I feel like
> -0.3 if there's no obvious advantage showing them.
xxx_desc() functions are debugging purpose functions as they are used
by pg_waldump and pg_walinspect etc. I think such functions should
show all contents unless there is reason to hide them. Particularly,
standby_desc_running_xacts() currently shows subtransaction
information only when subtransactions are overflowed, which got me
confused when inspecting WAL records.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-07-21 08:13:52 | Re: Remove fls(), use pg_bitutils.h facilities instead? |
Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2022-07-21 07:37:04 | Re: Pulling up direct-correlated ANY_SUBLINK |