| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Revive num_dead_tuples column of pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
| Date: | 2024-06-14 01:21:17 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoDJ6j0G1OoYZmQmKBJNvdzWr1vZLkuSZbM7_scy+cdw5w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 9:57 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 9:41 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:38:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > >> I was about to push the patch but let me confirm just in case: is it
> > >> okay to bump the catversion even after post-beta1?
> > >
> > > Yes, that happens somewhat routinely.
> >
> > Up to RC, even after beta2. This happens routinely every year because
> > tweaks are always required for what got committed. And that's OK to
> > do so now.
>
> Thank you both for confirmation. I'll push it shortly.
>
Pushed. Thank you for giving feedback and reviewing the patch!
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-06-14 01:24:23 | Re: jsonpath: Missing Binary Execution Path? |
| Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2024-06-14 01:09:54 | Re: jsonpath: Missing Binary Execution Path? |