Re: jsonpath: Missing Binary Execution Path?

From: Chapman Flack <jcflack(at)acm(dot)org>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonpath: Missing Binary Execution Path?
Date: 2024-06-14 01:09:54
Message-ID: 666B9862.5000608@acm.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/13/24 16:43, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Paging Mr. Eisentraut!

I'm not Mr. Eisentraut, but I have at last talked my way into some
access to the standard, so ...

Note 487 emphasizes that JSON path predicates "are not expressions;
instead they form a separate language that can only be invoked within
a <JSON filter expression>".

The only operators usable in a general expression (that is, a
<JSON path wff> are binary + - and binary * / % and unary + -
over a <JSON accessor expression>.

Inside a filter, you get to use a <JSON path predicate>. That's where
you can use ! and && and ||. But ! can only be applied to a
<JSON delimited predicate>: either a <JSON exists path predicate>,
or any other <JSON path predicate> wrapped in parentheses.

On 06/13/24 11:32, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> david=# select jsonb_path_query('true', '$ && $');
> david=# select jsonb_path_query('true', '$.boolean() && $.boolean()');

Those don't work because, as you recognized, they're not inside filters.

> david=# select jsonb_path_query('[1, 3, 7]', '$[*] ? (@.boolean() && @.boolean())');

That doesn't work because the operands of && or || must have the grammatical
form of predicates; it's not enough that they be expressions of boolean
type. '$[*] ? (@.boolean() == true && @.boolean() == true)' ought to work
(though in any other context you'd probably call it a code smell!) because
each operand is now a <JSON comparison predicate>.

Regards,
-Chap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-06-14 01:21:17 Re: Revive num_dead_tuples column of pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Previous Message Aaron Altman 2024-06-14 01:07:21 Re: Optimize numeric.c mul_var() using the Karatsuba algorithm