From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vinayak <Pokale_Vinayak_q3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Vinayak Pokale <vinpokale(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers |
Date: | 2017-02-06 13:48:56 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoDJ+chXMGck9hOctD_AKT-oiBJ8QkcAaEo+noZx9Gbk_Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> "txn" can be used for abbreviation of "Transaction", so for example
>> pg_fdw_txn_resolver?
>> I'm also fine to change the module and function name.
>
> If we're judging the relative clarity of various ways of abbreviating
> the word "transaction", "txn" surely beats "x".
>
> To repeat my usual refrain, is there any merit to abbreviating at all?
> Could we call it, say, "fdw_transaction_resolver" or
> "fdw_transaction_manager"?
>
Almost modules in contrib are name with "pg_" prefix but I prefer
"fdw_transcation_resolver" if we don't need "pg_" prefix.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2017-02-06 14:16:04 | Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-02-06 13:45:01 | Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines |