From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Scott Milliken <scott(at)deltaex(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on a function index |
Date: | 2017-08-03 00:59:50 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoDGonbnNZtHmG77VTRVbdLqtFCciHci1ULMAaiSsAhQ9g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 8/1/17 21:23, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>>> On 2017-08-01 16:28:31 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> On 7/28/17 06:07, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>>>> I could reproduced this issue and it seems to me that the cause of
>>>>> this is that the table sync worker didn't get a snapshot before
>>>>> starting table copy. Attached patch fixes this problem.
>>>>
>>>> Should it be GetTransactionSnapshot() rather than GetLatestSnapshot()?
>>>
>>> Don't think it makes a meaningful difference here, but I agree it's more
>>> consistent.
>>
>> +1.
>
> committed with that change
>
Thank you!
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashesh Vashi | 2017-08-03 01:19:58 | Re: pgAdmin 4 issues |
Previous Message | scott | 2017-08-02 23:59:27 | BUG #14769: Logical replication error "cache lookup failed for type 0" |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-03 01:31:56 | Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2017-08-03 00:53:46 | Re: Confusing error message in pgbench |