From: | Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Mika Eloranta <mel(at)ohmu(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pg_basebackup: progress report max once per second |
Date: | 2014-01-31 09:59:05 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoBzo7C1YWsuC+Bjkb-=GJy4qoL_4sxDr4dLHkbDwds0Hw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi> wrote:
> 18.11.2013 07:53, Sawada Masahiko kirjoitti:
>>>
>>> On 13 Nov 2013, at 20:51, Mika Eloranta <mel(at)ohmu(dot)fi> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Prevent excessive progress reporting that can grow to gigabytes
>>>> of output with large databases.
>>
>>
>> I got error with following scenario.
>>
>> $ initdb -D data -E UTF8 --no-locale
>> /* setting the replication parameters */
>> $ pg_basebackup -D 2data
>> Floating point exception
>> LOG: could not send data to client: Broken pipe
>> ERROR: base backup could not send data, aborting backup
>> FATAL: connection to client lost
>
>
> Attached a rebased patch with a fix for division by zero error plus some
> code style issues. I also moved the patch to the current commitfest.
>
Thank you for updating the patch!
I have reviewed it easily.
I didn't get error of compile, and the patch works fine.
I have one question.
What does it mean the calling progress_report() which you added at end
of ReceiveUnpackTarFile() and RecieveTarFile()?
I could not understand necessity of this code. And the force argument
of progress_report() is also same.
If you would like to use 'force' option, I think that you should add
the comment to source code about it.
Regards,
-------
Sawada Masahiko
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2014-01-31 10:03:46 | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-01-31 09:54:19 | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition - v0.2 |