Re: maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum
Date: 2025-03-18 23:45:55
Message-ID: CAD21AoBP2Kr4vSGWDAoqXep6F7+wO3DKi5KJ+NkS-2Re06ukaQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:54 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 19:34, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I've attached the updated patch.
>
> Looks good to me.

Thank you for reviewing the patch. Pushed (backpatched to v17).

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Smith 2025-03-18 23:52:04 Re: Increase default maintenance_io_concurrency to 16
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-03-18 23:33:37 Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io