Re: Separate GUC for replication origins

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 6:05 PM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, at 8:44 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> I would suggest putting the new max_active_replication_origins after
> max_parallel_apply_workers_per_subscription as both
> max_sync_workers_per_subscription and
> max_parallel_apply_workers_per_subscription are related to
> max_logical_replication_workers.
>
>
> Good point. Looking at the documentation, the old max_replication_slots
> parameter was the first one in that section so I decided to use the same order
> for the postgresql.conf.sample.

Thank you for updating the patch!

The patch looks good to me. I've updated the commit message and
squashed the second patch as we agreed that we don't need to have the
codes for supporting backward compatibility IIUC. I'm going to push
the patch barring any objections and further comments.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com