From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Amit Kapila <akapila(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: typos |
Date: | 2022-04-11 10:25:14 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoApBKdr-RK2pP8xCYXkpOEb_mNYgo5vMytvRB6OOc3Eug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 7:10 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:39:30PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > I'm not entirely certain this is an improvement. Your commit message
> > I'd say is not true going by git grep "compression algorithm". There
> > are 3 matches in the docs and take [1], for example. I'd say in that
> > one it's better to use "algorithm". In that case, "method" could be
> > talking about client or server.
>
> I am not wedded to this change; but, for context, I wrote this patch before
> basebackup supported multiple compression ... "things". I didn't touch
> basebackup here, since Robert defended that choice of words in another thread
> (starting at 20220320194050(dot)GX28503(at)telsasoft(dot)com).
>
> This change is for pg_column_compression(), and the only other use of
> "compression algorithm" in the docs is in pgcrypto (which is in contrib). That
> the docs consistently use "method" suggests continuing to use that rather than
> something else. It could be described in some central place (like if we
> support common syntax between interfaces which expose compression).
>
> > 0010:
> > I don't understand this change.
>
> The commit message mentions 959f6d6a1, which makes newbindir optional. But the
> documentation wasn't updated, and seems to indicate that it's still required.
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/pgupgrade.html
>
> > 0011:
> > I can't quite parse the original. I might not have enough context
> > here. Robert, Joe? (new to master)
>
> See the link in the commit message where someone else reported the same
> problem.
>
> > 0019:
> > -1. pgindent will fix these.
>
> But two of those are from 2016.
>
> Thanks for amending and pushing those. There's some more less obvious ones
> attached.
>
> Amit or Masahiko may want to comment on 0012 (doc review: Add ALTER
> SUBSCRIPTION ... SKIP).
Thank you for the patch! I've looked at 0012 patch. Regarding the
following part:
<function>pg_replication_origin_advance()</function></link> function
- transaction. Before using this function, the subscription needs
to be disabled
+ XXX? transaction. Before using this function, the subscription
needs to be disabled
temporarily either by <command>ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ...
DISABLE</command> or, the
we can remove "transaction", it seems a typo. The rest looks good to me.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-04-11 10:40:10 | Re: PG DOCS - logical replication filtering |
Previous Message | John Naylor | 2022-04-11 10:11:47 | Re: A qsort template |