From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: logical replication: \dRp+ and "for all tables" |
Date: | 2017-06-10 05:20:58 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoAJkmNUvogG47vxS-RMFNV90tRCiicAJeqvMN3qLUi2yQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If I create a publication "for all tables", \dRp+ doesn't indicate it is for
> all tables, it just gives a list of the tables.
>
> So it doesn't distinguish between a publication specified to be for all
> tables (which will be dynamic regarding future additions), and one which
> just happens to include all the table which currently exist.
>
> That seems unfortunate. Should the "for all tables" be included as another
> column in \dRp and \dRp+, or at least as a footnote tag in \dRp+ ?
>
+1. I was thinking the same. Attached patch adds "All Tables" column
to both \dRp and \dRp+.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
psql_publication.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-06-10 06:02:19 | Re: logical replication: \dRp+ and "for all tables" |
Previous Message | Vinayak Pokale | 2017-06-10 03:23:33 | Re: ECPG: WHENEVER statement with DO CONTINUE action |