From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup wish list |
Date: | 2016-08-19 05:04:16 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoABauT+SyhRKYb10fGR0v=yuYUtFQZL8sNf4yYeaQh8ew@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 7/12/16 9:55 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> And what I think is pg_baseback never remove the directory specified
>> by -D option even if execution is failed. initdb command behaves so.
>> I think it's helpful for backup operation.
>
> This has been bothering me as well.
>
> How about the attached patch as a start?
>
Thank you for the patch!
I agree with adding this as an option and removing directory by default.
And it looks good to me except for missing new line in usage output.
printf(_(" -l, --label=LABEL set backup label\n"));
+ printf(_(" -n, --noclean do not clean up after errors"));
printf(_(" -P, --progress show progress information\n"));
Registered this patch to CF1.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2016-08-19 06:02:41 | Re: Slowness of extended protocol |
Previous Message | amul sul | 2016-08-19 04:53:43 | Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). |