| From: | amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). |
| Date: | 2016-08-19 04:53:43 |
| Message-ID: | 1331115387.14768003.1471582423575.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday, August 19, 2016 12:42 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:35 AM, amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:
>
>
>> Hmm. I haven't really looked into the code, but with applying both patches it looks precisely imitate Oracle's behaviour. Thanks.
>
>
>This is good to hear, but for us to consider applying something like
>this, somebody would need to look into the code pretty deeply.
Sure Robert, Im planning to start initial review until next week at the earliest. Thanks
Regards,
Amul Sul
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2016-08-19 05:04:16 | Re: pg_basebackup wish list |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-08-19 02:21:40 | Re: errno clobbering in reorderbuffer |