From: | Michael Guissine <mguissine(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17652: Performance degradation after migrating from v13.4 to v14.4 |
Date: | 2022-10-19 19:44:03 |
Message-ID: | CACxDrAntfsaV+poMpBTVQC0KOSaSEzHc71cDhV+h-Qv7=Ysd6w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
paritioned_table_hash_p3_partition_key_text_idx is in fact pg_trgm index,
you are right!
interesting, why would it use that index at all on some partitions but not
on others? the query is a simple match on 3 columns and we have other
indexes to cover it
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 3:01 PM Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 1:30 PM Michael Guissine <mguissine(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Sorry I should've mentioned that. Yes we did ANALYZE all the tables after
>> upgrade, we even went ahead and REINDEX all indexes and then also run
>> VACUUM ANALYZE but still facing same performance issue
>>
>
> I'm guessing that paritioned_table_hash_p3_partition_key_text_idx is a
> pg_trgm index, and that you are victim of the change "Allow GiST/GIN
> pg_trgm indexes to do equality lookups". It is not surprising that this
> change would bite someone. If you can redo the upgrade but this time
> refrain from upgrading pg_trgm from 1.5 to 1.6, that should fix the issue
> (assuming RDS even gives you enough control to do that), or drop the
> extension and recreate it specifically as version 1.5 (which unfortunately
> would cascade to dropping all the indexes, and they would need to be
> recreated after--even though the index structures themselves would require
> no change).
>
> I have a file which would let you downgrade the extension without needing
> to drop all the pg_trgm indexes, but there is no way for you to deploy that
> to RDS.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
>>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-10-19 20:12:12 | Re: BUG #17652: Performance degradation after migrating from v13.4 to v14.4 |
Previous Message | Michael Guissine | 2022-10-19 19:32:17 | Re: BUG #17652: Performance degradation after migrating from v13.4 to v14.4 |