From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Guissine <mguissine(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17652: Performance degradation after migrating from v13.4 to v14.4 |
Date: | 2022-10-19 20:12:12 |
Message-ID: | 20221019201212.qt2kucgkq3abguix@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On 2022-10-19 15:32:17 -0400, Michael Guissine wrote:
> The column names in the plan and queries are obfuscated
I guessed so :)
> Indexes:
> "partitioned_table_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (partition_key, id)
> "partitioned_table_partition_key_start_time_index" btree
> (partition_key, start_time)
> "partitioned_table_partition_key_start_time_text" btree
> (partition_key, start_time, text)
> "partitioned_table_partition_key_text_idx" gin (partition_key,
> text gin_trgm_ops)
> "partitioned_table_text_tsv_index" gin
> (to_tsvector('simple'::regconfig, text)) WHERE text IS NOT NULL
> Number of partitions: 128 (Use \d+ to list them.)
Ok, that explains why we see the massive rechecks. For the bitmap scans we end
up using a gin index instead of the btree index.
The reason you're seeing this in 14 is likely the following entry in the
release notes:
> Allow GiST/GIN pg_trgm indexes to do equality lookups (Julien Rouhaud)
> This is similar to LIKE except no wildcards are honored.
CCed author/committer of that change. I suspect this would need proper costing
to not be inadvertently be used.
I assume you need the pg_trgm index?
In theory you could likely work around the issue by reverting the relevant
catalog change:
+ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY gin_trgm_ops USING gin ADD
+ OPERATOR 11 pg_catalog.= (text, text);
by issuing
ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY gin_trgm_ops USING gin DROP OPERATOR 11 (text, text);
but I suspect you won't be allowed to do that in RDS.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-10-19 20:20:37 | Re: BUG #17652: Performance degradation after migrating from v13.4 to v14.4 |
Previous Message | Michael Guissine | 2022-10-19 19:44:03 | Re: BUG #17652: Performance degradation after migrating from v13.4 to v14.4 |