From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | JORGE MALDONADO <jorgemal1960(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: One tablespace or several tablespaces |
Date: | 2016-04-11 13:40:30 |
Message-ID: | CACjxUsOpCWfufW8xz3n6w+9=jMwBaL3VDRU0VRspQhuHmv9jBg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 1:42 PM, JORGE MALDONADO <jorgemal1960(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am developing an information system that will be used by several clientes,
> each client has its own database, and each database has exactly the same
> structure for each client. The only difference is the name of the database.
> I have been thinking about whether or not using one tablespace to create all
> of the databases or to use one tablespace for each database, but I have not
> found a good reason for using one method or the other.
Generally I have found it best to use a single tablespace except
when there is a clear reason to do otherwise. Usually that reason,
if it exists, is to allow storing less frequently accessed data on
a slow, cheaper medium.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Begin Daniel | 2016-04-11 14:56:48 | Re: One tablespace or several tablespaces |
Previous Message | Luca Ferrari | 2016-04-08 10:00:10 | Re: Postgresql - Inline comment in VIEW Sql definition |