Re: One tablespace or several tablespaces

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: JORGE MALDONADO <jorgemal1960(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: One tablespace or several tablespaces
Date: 2016-04-11 13:40:30
Message-ID: CACjxUsOpCWfufW8xz3n6w+9=jMwBaL3VDRU0VRspQhuHmv9jBg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 1:42 PM, JORGE MALDONADO <jorgemal1960(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am developing an information system that will be used by several clientes,
> each client has its own database, and each database has exactly the same
> structure for each client. The only difference is the name of the database.
> I have been thinking about whether or not using one tablespace to create all
> of the databases or to use one tablespace for each database, but I have not
> found a good reason for using one method or the other.

Generally I have found it best to use a single tablespace except
when there is a clear reason to do otherwise. Usually that reason,
if it exists, is to allow storing less frequently accessed data on
a slow, cheaper medium.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Begin Daniel 2016-04-11 14:56:48 Re: One tablespace or several tablespaces
Previous Message Luca Ferrari 2016-04-08 10:00:10 Re: Postgresql - Inline comment in VIEW Sql definition