Re: Perf decreased although server is better

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Benjamin Toueg <btoueg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rick Otten <rottenwindfish(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performa(dot)" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Perf decreased although server is better
Date: 2016-11-04 14:05:38
Message-ID: CACjxUsOVpfTXB=JnZGZGE0O7RNRM5qmkv9K-Ui+uE_NHWCsPfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Benjamin Toueg <btoueg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I don't see how this can be due to network latency!

I'm not suggesting it is due to network latency -- it is due to the
latency for storage requests. That won't depend on network latency
unless you are going to a LAN for storage.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2016-11-04 16:19:19 Re: archive_command too slow.
Previous Message Rick Otten 2016-11-04 13:29:58 Re: Perf decreased although server is better