Re: Regarding built-in logical replication

From: Ranjan Gajare <ranjangajare(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regarding built-in logical replication
Date: 2018-01-12 02:18:22
Message-ID: CACj5rkZW_iB=JBBB1bP5gZRCpwGBPK6XrOHY3U5aj5nMF5Wb_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

This means it would work with version 10 and its later versions. No
backward compatibility is possible.
Thanks for resolution.

Ranjan Gajare

On 12-Jan-2018 2:14 AM, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

On 1/11/18 09:48, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html
> Description:
>
> I am referring to link
> 'https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html' and
it
> has been mentioned that 'Replicating between different major versions of
> PostgreSQL.' under the section of 'The typical use-cases for logical
> replication are:' but I don't think logical replication using
> PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION model is possible between different PostgreSQL
> versions, which is only possible using pglogical.

The documentation is correct.

(The only caveat is that there are currently no other versions than 10
that have built-in logical replication, but if there were any, it would
work.)

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-01-12 21:53:47 Re: [DOCS] No reference to postgres_fdw in FTS docs
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-11 20:44:39 Re: Regarding built-in logical replication