From: | Ranjan Gajare <ranjangajare(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Regarding built-in logical replication |
Date: | 2018-01-12 02:18:22 |
Message-ID: | CACj5rkZW_iB=JBBB1bP5gZRCpwGBPK6XrOHY3U5aj5nMF5Wb_g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
This means it would work with version 10 and its later versions. No
backward compatibility is possible.
Thanks for resolution.
Ranjan Gajare
On 12-Jan-2018 2:14 AM, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
On 1/11/18 09:48, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html
> Description:
>
> I am referring to link
> 'https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html' and
it
> has been mentioned that 'Replicating between different major versions of
> PostgreSQL.' under the section of 'The typical use-cases for logical
> replication are:' but I don't think logical replication using
> PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION model is possible between different PostgreSQL
> versions, which is only possible using pglogical.
The documentation is correct.
(The only caveat is that there are currently no other versions than 10
that have built-in logical replication, but if there were any, it would
work.)
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-01-12 21:53:47 | Re: [DOCS] No reference to postgres_fdw in FTS docs |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-01-11 20:44:39 | Re: Regarding built-in logical replication |