Re: [DOCS] No reference to postgres_fdw in FTS docs

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:50:39AM +0000, steven(dot)winfield(at)cantabcapital(dot)com wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/textsearch-indexes.html
> Description:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/textsearch-indexes.html
>
> The last paragraph mentions the dblink module, but surely postgres_fdw
> deserves a mention here too - especially with its increasing ability to push
> more of the query onto the foreign servers.
>
> Also, I think it would be worth mentioning elsewhere in the documentation
> (e.g. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/indexes-types.html) the
> impact that maintenance_work_mem has on the creation time for different
> index types - currently I can't find this anywhere else except on this FTS
> page.

I have applied the attached doc patch which will appear in PG 11.
Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +