From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Artur Zakirov <zaartur(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals |
Date: | 2020-03-24 10:27:30 |
Message-ID: | CACPNZCvWRHL1cz_GAY-QJb+NpZtbhEHfHqLOpHT5=qgcUOVfAQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 2:26 PM I wrote:
>
> To get more logical behavior, perhaps the optional parameter is better
> as an offset instead of an origin. Alternatively (or additionally),
> the function could do the math on int64 timestamps directly.
For v6, I changed the algorithm to use pg_tm for months and years, and
int64 for all smaller units. Despite the split, I think it's easier to
read now, and certainly shorter. This has the advantage that now
mixing units is allowed, as long as you don't mix months/years with
days or smaller, which often doesn't make sense and is not very
practical. (not yet documented) One consequence of this is that when
operating on months/years, and the origin contains smaller units, the
smaller units are ignored. Example:
select date_trunc_interval('12 months'::interval, timestamp
'2012-03-01 01:21:01', timestamp '2011-03-22');
date_trunc_interval
---------------------
2012-03-01 00:00:00
(1 row)
Even though not quite a full year has passed, it ignores the days in
the origin time and detects a difference in 12 calendar months. That
might be fine, although we could also throw an error and say origins
must be in the form of 'YYYY-01-01 00:00:00' when truncating on months
and/or years.
I added a sketch of documentation for the origin parameter and more tests.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 7:48 PM Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm confused by this. If my calendars are correct, both 1900-01-02 and 2020-02-11 are Tuesdays. So if the date being adjusted and the origin are both Tuesday, shouldn't the day part be left alone when truncating to 7 days? Also, I'd like to confirm that the default starting point for 7 day periods (weeks) is Monday, per ISO.
This is fixed.
select date_trunc_interval('7 days'::interval, timestamp '2020-02-11
01:01:01.0', TIMESTAMP '1900-01-02');
date_trunc_interval
---------------------
2020-02-11 00:00:00
(1 row)
select date_trunc_interval('7 days'::interval, d), count(*) from
generate_series( '2020-02-01'::timestamp, '2020-03-31', '1 day') d
group by 1 order by 1;
date_trunc_interval | count
---------------------+-------
2020-01-27 00:00:00 | 2
2020-02-03 00:00:00 | 7
2020-02-10 00:00:00 | 7
2020-02-17 00:00:00 | 7
2020-02-24 00:00:00 | 7
2020-03-02 00:00:00 | 7
2020-03-09 00:00:00 | 7
2020-03-16 00:00:00 | 7
2020-03-23 00:00:00 | 7
2020-03-30 00:00:00 | 2
(10 rows)
> Perhaps the starting point for dates should be either 0001-01-01 (the proleptic beginning of the CE calendar) or 2001-01-01 (the beginning of the current 400-year repeating cycle of leap years and weeks, and a Monday, giving the appropriate ISO result for truncating to 7 day periods).
I went ahead with 2001-01-01 for the time being.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 4:20 PM Artur Zakirov <zaartur(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> =# select date_trunc_interval('1.1 year'::interval, TIMESTAMP
> '2020-02-01 01:21:01');
> ERROR: only one interval unit allowed for truncation
For any lingering cases like this (i don't see any), maybe an error
hint is in order. The following works now, as expected for 1 year 1
month:
select date_trunc_interval('1.1 year'::interval, timestamp '2002-05-01
01:21:01');
date_trunc_interval
---------------------
2002-02-01 00:00:0
I'm going to look into implementing timezone while awaiting comments on v6.
--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v6-datetrunc_interval.patch | application/octet-stream | 12.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-03-24 10:34:55 | Re: Silence compiler warnings with Python 3.9 |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2020-03-24 10:02:47 | Re: proposal \gcsv |