Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 11:24 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-04-18 14:10:29 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > My compromise suggestion would be to try to give John and Amit ~2 weeks
> > to come up with a cleanup proposal, and then decide whether to 1) revert
> > 2) apply the new patch, 3) decide to live with the warts for 12, and
> > apply the patch in 13. As we would already have a patch, 3) seems like
> > it'd be more tenable than without.
>
> I think decision time has come. My tentative impression is that we're
> not there yet, and should revert the improvements in v12, and apply the
> improved version early in v13. As a second choice, we should live with
> the current approach, if John and Amit "promise" further effort to clean
> this up for v13.

Yes, the revised approach is not currently as mature as the one in
HEAD. It's not ready. Not wanting to attempt Promise Driven
Development, I'd rather revert, and only try again if there's enough
time and interest.

--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services