Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch
Date: 2019-05-01 15:24:25
Message-ID: 20190501152425.weyzniimt6lrn3su@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-04-18 14:10:29 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> My compromise suggestion would be to try to give John and Amit ~2 weeks
> to come up with a cleanup proposal, and then decide whether to 1) revert
> 2) apply the new patch, 3) decide to live with the warts for 12, and
> apply the patch in 13. As we would already have a patch, 3) seems like
> it'd be more tenable than without.

I think decision time has come. My tentative impression is that we're
not there yet, and should revert the improvements in v12, and apply the
improved version early in v13. As a second choice, we should live with
the current approach, if John and Amit "promise" further effort to clean
this up for v13.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2019-05-01 15:28:11 Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2019-05-01 15:04:53 Re: to_timestamp docs