Re: BUG #13845: Incorrect week number

From: "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>
To: kees(dot)westerlaken(at)valuecare(dot)nl
Cc: Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #13845: Incorrect week number
Date: 2016-01-05 11:11:54
Message-ID: CACACo5TnQ9G_8CBf=xx105fSL12KDkO0MXWNytST_UC5p-u+zw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Shulgin, Oleksandr <
oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:59 AM, <kees(dot)westerlaken(at)valuecare(dot)nl> wrote:
>
>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Bug reference: 13845
>> Logged by: Kees Westerlaken
>> Email address: kees(dot)westerlaken(at)valuecare(dot)nl
>> PostgreSQL version: 9.2.10
>> Operating system: Linux
>> Description:
>>
>> 2016 is a year where week numbers (US) differ from ISO.
>>
>> On 1 januari 2016 it works OK.
>> select to_char(to_date('20160101', 'YYYYMMDD'), 'YYYYWW')
>> produces 201601, while
>> select to_char(to_date('20160101', 'YYYYMMDD'), 'YYYYIW')
>> produces 201553.
>>
>
> It gets worse on HEAD:
>
> postgres=# select to_char(to_date('20160101', 'YYYYMMDD'), 'YYYY:IW');
> to_char
> ---------
> 2016:53
> (1 row)
>
> This is something close to 2017 already.
>

Scratch that, I'm confused about YYYY format, has to use IYYY instead.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Feike Steenbergen 2016-01-05 13:32:43 Re: BUG #13845: Incorrect week number
Previous Message Shulgin, Oleksandr 2016-01-05 11:09:04 Re: BUG #13845: Incorrect week number