Re: BUG #13845: Incorrect week number

From: "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>
To: kees(dot)westerlaken(at)valuecare(dot)nl
Cc: Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #13845: Incorrect week number
Date: 2016-01-05 11:09:04
Message-ID: CACACo5RY7TK4C7hVBKX1-C=BZgmY6D3rnTKMcAhYO=J+CFwNWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:59 AM, <kees(dot)westerlaken(at)valuecare(dot)nl> wrote:

> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 13845
> Logged by: Kees Westerlaken
> Email address: kees(dot)westerlaken(at)valuecare(dot)nl
> PostgreSQL version: 9.2.10
> Operating system: Linux
> Description:
>
> 2016 is a year where week numbers (US) differ from ISO.
>
> On 1 januari 2016 it works OK.
> select to_char(to_date('20160101', 'YYYYMMDD'), 'YYYYWW')
> produces 201601, while
> select to_char(to_date('20160101', 'YYYYMMDD'), 'YYYYIW')
> produces 201553.
>

It gets worse on HEAD:

postgres=# select to_char(to_date('20160101', 'YYYYMMDD'), 'YYYY:IW');
to_char
---------
2016:53
(1 row)

This is something close to 2017 already.

--
Alex

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shulgin, Oleksandr 2016-01-05 11:11:54 Re: BUG #13845: Incorrect week number
Previous Message kees.westerlaken 2016-01-05 10:59:24 BUG #13845: Incorrect week number