Re: Postgres 11 release notes

From: Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Date: 2018-06-16 12:56:05
Message-ID: CAC8Q8tKbYmNdiyWr7hE4GfMY4fbqHKkFziKgrUuWHH6HJQs3og@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

>
> > I'm not sure it is usefull in release notes since it is more about API,
> and not
> > user-facing change. Just in case.
> > GiST opclasses now can omit compress and decompress functions. If
> compress
> > function is omited, IndexOnlyScan is enabled for opclass without any
> extra
> > change.
> > https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/
> > d3a4f89d8a3e500bd7c0b7a8a8a5ce1b47859128
>
> Uh, we do have this for SP-GiST:
>
> Allow SP-GiST indexes to optionally use compression (Teodor Sigaev,
> Heikki Linnakangas, Alexander Korotkov, Nikita Glukhov)
>
> I am unclear how far downt the API stack I should go in documenting
> changes like this.
>

It is also a bit misleading - the idea in that change is that now index
representation can be a lossy version of actual data type (a box instead of
polygon as a referende, so a changelog entry can tell "Allow SP-GiST index
creation for polygon datatype."). There is no "decompression" for such
thing. "compression" sounds like gzip for me in user-facing context.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2018-06-16 13:20:29 Re: WAL prefetch
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2018-06-16 10:26:52 Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-06-17 13:21:27 Re: SCRAM with channel binding downgrade attack
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-06-15 21:23:27 Re: SCRAM with channel binding downgrade attack