Re: SCRAM with channel binding downgrade attack

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: SCRAM with channel binding downgrade attack
Date: 2018-06-17 13:21:27
Message-ID: 20180617132127.GA7388@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 05:23:27PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> I still think that the fact that we are still discussing what is basically
>> the *basic concepts* of how this would be set up after we have released
>> beta1 is a clear sign that this should not go into 11.
>
> +1.

Yes, that sounds right.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-06-17 14:46:08 Re: Slow planning time for simple query
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-06-17 13:11:39 Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2018-06-18 13:16:50 Re: Fix grouping headers in CF app
Previous Message Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski 2018-06-16 12:56:05 Re: Postgres 11 release notes