From: | sia kc <siavosh(dot)kasravi(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A starter task |
Date: | 2024-09-16 08:35:24 |
Message-ID: | CABrJ=6QkSSoM3r9w=G4-=sBVua9SbwL_Jtqm2HZ7C=qt8fKZ2g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 11:28 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> wrote:
> On 9/16/24 00:17, sia kc wrote:
> > I have a bad experience. I picked up a task from MariaDB backlog,
> > explained in their chat rooms that I started doing that. After it was
> > done which was a SQL command which MySQL already supported to restart
> > server instance with SQL, they started rethinking the validity of the
> > feature for the MariaDB. So the task got suspended.
> >
>
> Unfortunately this can happen here too, to some extent. Sometimes it's
> not obvious how complex the patch will be, the feature may conflict with
> another feature in some unexpected way, etc. It's not like we have a
> 100% validated and agreed design somewhere.
>
> This is why my advice is to pick a patch the contributor is personally
> interested in. It puts him/her in a better position to advocate for the
> feature, decide what trade offs are more appropriate, etc.
>
By picking a patch I assume you mean picking an already done task and
seeing for example how I would have done it, right?
>
> > About inlining not sure how it is done with gmail. Maybe should use
> > another email client.
> >
>
> Can you just expand the email, hit enter in a place where you want to
> add a response, and write.
>
>
Thanks.
--
Siavosh Kasravi
* "Save a Tree" - Please print this email only if necessary.*
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marlene Reiterer | 2024-09-16 08:45:47 | Re: Doc: Move standalone backup section, mention -X argument |
Previous Message | Sven Klemm | 2024-09-16 08:33:56 | Re: Regression tests fail with tzdata 2024b |