Re: dynamic monitoring

From: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
To: Brad DeJong <bpd0018(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dynamic monitoring
Date: 2025-02-22 04:40:45
Message-ID: CABV9wwNynWT_it-nfov5250=KCV1KnAWnFb+fLqg-HFObDgtXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 1:18 PM Brad DeJong <bpd0018(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the section on dynamic monitoring, I found the following
> sentence confusing. I originally read it as "enclose the script"
> and "used to allow that too to be checked" instead of "enclose
> the script used" and "to allow that too to be checked".
>
> When discussing information found using dynamic tracing,
> be sure to enclose the script used to allow that too to be
> checked and discussed.
>
> Could it be rephrased as something like this?
>
> When discussing information found using dynamic tracing,
> be sure to enclose the script used to find the information
> so that both the script and the information can be checked
> and discussed.
>
> Regards,
> Brad
>
> C:\src\postgresql\doc\src\sgml>git diff -p
> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
> index 71c4f96d05..d89261326a 100644
> --- a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
> @@ -7428,7 +7428,8 @@ Total time (ns) 2312105013
> be meaningless. In most cases where problems are found it is the
> instrumentation that is at fault, not the underlying system. When
> discussing information found using dynamic tracing, be sure to enclose
> - the script used to allow that too to be checked and discussed.
> + the script used to find that information so that both the script
> + and the information can be checked and discussed.
> </para>
> </sect2>

+1 from me.

Robert Treat
https://xzilla.net

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shlok Kyal 2025-02-22 05:56:31 Re: pg_copy_logical_replication_slot doesn't copy the failover property
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2025-02-21 21:42:44 Re: Second paragraph a little bit misleading