Re: Spam on the wiki

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Spam on the wiki
Date: 2015-12-17 15:19:38
Message-ID: CABUevEzy0Q8cBoP2S3_9PCtQze_MsL25oh=vwMpxeOZ3v3n29A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:

> On 17-12-2015 12:13, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Yeah. I have no idea how mediawiki actually works with those things, but
> > I'm not sure what else we can do. It's been suggested to have a
> > cooling-off period for new accounts, but how long should that be... I
> > guess we could have a 2-4 week cooling off period and then some way to
> > bypass it by contacting someone manually, but who's going to deal with
> > those approvals?
> >
> Why don't we create a group of known community members? This group can
> edit without restriction but new accounts will be moderated.
>

Yeah, that might be the reasonable thing to do. We can probably cover 90+%
of all edits by such a solution. But somebody still has to clean up the
crap in the moderation queue.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-12-17 15:21:22 Re: Spam on the wiki
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2015-12-17 15:18:47 Re: Spam on the wiki